


Contractors need a structured way to tie billing to project progress. A schedule of values (SOV) provides it.
SOVs help construction companies track cash flow accurately and support compliant revenue recognition throughout the entire project lifecycle. Typically, general contractors prepare and submit the SOV to the project owner, while subcontractors prepare their own and present it to the GC. Owners, lenders, and finance teams routinely review these documents to confirm progress before they approve pay applications.
Here’s what a SOV is in construction and how to make sure it actually supports project job costing and contract billing. This guide breaks down everything construction companies and finance leaders need to know about preparing and managing SOVs efficiently.
A construction SOV is a document that breaks down the total contract value into an itemized list of individual work items and cost categories. It’s primarily used to assist with project billing. It also plays an important role in project-based accounting because it lets contractors report and bill for work as the project progresses rather than at closeout.
The AIA G703 (Continuation Sheet) is the industry standard and most common format for an SOV, acting as the line-item breakdown. It’s used alongside the AIA G702 pay application form, which functions as the main invoice cover page.
Every item in an SOV reflects a portion of the total contract value and project scope. Each item carries a scheduled dollar value, and progress against it is tracked as a percentage of completion, forming the framework for measuring progress and billing.
The goal of an SOV is to make sure the total contract amount is billed correctly throughout the project lifecycle. It’s not an internal budget document, which would instead break down overhead, labor, and material costs to guide cost management for the contractor. In contrast, the SOV connects to the contractual scope agreement and structures how the project is billed to the owner.
An SOV in construction is critical because it allows teams to:
While some construction companies use customized formats, most structure their SOVs based on the AIA G703 sheet, which is a SOV construction example (or template) with standardized columns so owners, GCs, and finance teams can easily track progress and payments.
Regardless of format, every SOV should include the following components:
Every line item must be tied to a specific cost category or scope of work, such as excavation or electrical work.
Each line item’s scheduled value is the assigned dollar amount for that item. Across the SOV, these values must add up to 100% of the total contract value.
This reflects the progress of work completed for each line item, which appears as either a percentage or dollar amount.
Work completed outlines the value of work that’s already been approved and billed in previous pay applications.
This breaks down the value of work completed since the last pay application, which tracks progress for the current billing period.
SOVs should include the cost for materials that the contractor has purchased and delivered to the jobsite, but not installed. Billing for stored materials typically requires proof of purchase and storage, usually through invoices and other documentation.
The running balance outlines the portion of each line item that’s unpaid, helping contractors and stakeholders track outstanding work and value.
This is the portion of each line item value withheld until the construction project reaches certain milestones or finally ends. Retainage , usually 5 to 10% of each progress payment, is withheld until the project hits defined milestones or reaches completion. It gives the owner leverage to make sure the work is finished and any defects are corrected.
Effective SOVs require careful planning and ongoing alignment between parties. That means contractors have to go beyond listing items and consider the broader function of the document.
Here’s how to create an SOV in construction:
To create and manage SOVs accurately, implement the following best practices:
SOVs and cost budgets serve distinct purposes. Instead of trying to make them identical, which reduces flexibility and creates unnecessary limitations, prioritize mapping between the two. This helps reconcile billings with actual costs.
The sum of all line items needs to add up to the exact total contract value. Imbalances can delay payments and result in compliance issues.
Cross-reference each pay application with actual costs, including labor and materials. This core process prevents poor job costing and maintains accurate WIP reports.
Contractors, owners, architects, and finance teams need to align on SOV structure. Effective coordination prevents disputes down the line and ensures consistency in billing cycles.
SOVs present challenges, even for experienced construction teams. There are a few common pitfalls that can impact financial accuracy when it comes to SOVs:
Assigning too-high values to work during mobilization or site prep can raise red flags for owners during early review. Some contractors attempt to inflate values for early-phase line items to speed up cash flow, but this can cause owners to reject the schedule, which ultimately delays approval and pushes back the first pay application.
Detail is key to creating a practical SOV. Line items without proper descriptions make it difficult to track real progress or reconcile budgets with actual cost data.
When line item values don’t reflect real costs, it can lead to discrepancies between payments received and costs incurred, which disrupt cash flow.
Failing to routinely review and update SOVs to reflect pay applications leads to misalignment between progress and actual site conditions. If the owner or architect approves a change order, the SOV needs to reflect that immediately.
Since retainage is a critical safeguarding measure for owners, miscalculations can seriously damage the relationship between parties and impact firm reputation. It can also distort payment applications, which creates cash flow problems and ultimately puts a strain on financing. In some cases, errors can even be viewed as a breach of contract.
SOV accuracy relies on quality cost data. That’s why construction finance leaders are turning away from slow, error-prone manual reconciliation and generic payroll solutions, and toward construction-specific software.
An end-to-end construction management platform like Miter helps contractors access actual labor costs at the project level, including burdens like taxes, overtime, and fringe benefits. Miter automatically assigns every cost to the correct job and cost code, which provides a data-driven baseline for creating accurate SOVs.
Miter’s spend management also captures non-labor spend like reimbursements and per diems in real-time, making sure transactions are properly coded and routed for approval. Construction teams can even use Miter to manage onboarding, time tracking, and payroll compliance alongside expense management.
Learn how Miter’s Job Costing software can strengthen SOV management and streamline billing for construction companies.






