


Construction firms win work two ways. Competitive bidding rewards the lowest responsible price. Negotiated work rewards reputation and preconstruction involvement.
The second option sounds like the obvious choice. However, there’s a condition: the guaranteed maximum price (GMP). Any cost above the agreed-upon GMP comes out of the contractor’s fee rather than the owner’s budget.
This guide explains what GMP in construction is in more detail, how the maximum price gets set, and how this type of contract compares with others.
A GMP contract is a cost-plus-fee arrangement between a project owner and a contractor. In this agreement, the owner pays the actual costs associated with the project plus a negotiated fee to cover overhead and profit. The contractor proposes the GMP, the sum of estimated costs, contingency, and fee, during preconstruction.
They’re responsible for any expenses that exceed this cap. Below the ceiling, cost savings are generally returned to the owner or shared between parties.
But the ceiling can move. Owner-requested changes and unforeseen site conditions might raise costs. The contractor bears responsibility for cost growth inside the defined scope.
Two delivery methods account for most GMP construction work:
Both engage the contractor before the drawings are complete.
Most U.S. GMP contracts use published forms. Each defines which costs are reimbursable against the cap and which the contractor’s fee covers.
AIA A102–2017 is the owner-contractor agreement, used with A201–2017 general conditions. ConsensusDocs splits it in two: the 500 CMAR agreement with a 500.1 amendment that sets the GMP, and the 410 design-build agreement with a 410.1 amendment.
A GMP isn’t a bid. Instead, these contracts generally work in three stages.
Contract documents should clearly outline the work’s drawings, specifications, and budget. Skipping this step puts the contractor at risk of facing excess change orders and GMP disputes.
On a $10 million commercial construction project, here’s how a contractor might set a GMP at signing and where it lands at closeout.
| Component | At signing | Adjusted cap | Actual |
| Direct costs | $8,100,000 | $8,300,000 ⁽¹⁾ | $7,900,000 ⁽²⁾ |
| General conditions | $850,000 | $850,000 | $800,000 ⁽³⁾ |
| Allowances | $300,000 | $450,000 ⁽⁴⁾ | $450,000 |
| Contingency | $350,000 | $150,000 ⁽¹⁾ | $0 ⁽⁵⁾ |
| Contractor’s fee | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 |
| Cost plus fee | $10,000,000 | $10,150,000 | $9,550,000 |
| GMP | $10,000,000 | $10,150,000 | $10,150,000 |
| Contractor earns | $400,000 | $400,000 | $700,000 ⁽⁶⁾ |
| Owner pays | up to $10,000,000 | up to $10,150,000 | $9,850,000 ⁽⁶⁾ |
(1) Demolition exposed a concealed structural condition inside the original scope, so contingency absorbed the $200,000.
(2) Subcontract buyout closed $400,000 under estimate.
(3) The project finished on schedule, so time-driven overhead came in $50,000 light.
(4) The owner chose lobby finishes above the allowance. Added scope raises the cap by $150,000.
(5) Unspent contingency of $150,000 may stay inside the savings, depending on the contract.
(6) Cost plus fee closed $600,000 below the ceiling. A 50/50 savings clause gives each party $300,000.
A GMP contract transfers overrun risk to the contractor, which might sound undesirable. But there are many benefits, too.
The cap protects the owner against cost overruns. In exchange, the contractor locks in a fee competitive bidding could have driven down, improving job margins.
Offering a GMP is a claim about competence. The contractor trusts their own discipline enough to prevent going over the ceiling. Delivered repeatedly, that builds the reputation owners select on. Negotiated work then compounds into a backlog that doesn’t depend on hard bids.
Savings-sharing pays the contractor for efficiency, particularly when it comes to labor productivity and subcontract negotiation. Companies have a clear incentive to manage these costs well since they get to keep some of the savings. And the more efficient a team learns to be, the bigger share they can earn on the next GMP project.
Billing is tied to a schedule of values, so invoices follow a predictable, open-book pricing model. With it, finance teams can forecast working capital and retainage exposure across the life of the job.
Like any type of contract, GMP has its drawbacks. Here are a few things contractors should keep in mind before signing.
As projects progress, owners may want to adjust design elements like layouts and finishes. These adjustments can eat into contingency funds and push the project past its original budget. That’s why it’s so important to define change order processes before work actually starts. Everyone needs to agree to the adjustment; otherwise, the project scope can creep, eroding profit margins.
A reserve depleting ahead of progress signals poor job costing and estimation. Additional fees and payments add up. Negotiate contractor contingency separately from the owner’s, define who authorizes draws, and review both against percent complete each month.
CFMA benchmarking puts net income before taxes for industrial and nonresidential contractors at 4.1%, so cost overruns of $200,000 on a $10 million job erase half a typical fee. Finance leaders need to closely monitor labor, material, and overhead costs on a regular basis so spend doesn’t outrun the budget unchecked.
Some contracts allow owners to audit projects well after completion. To prevent any disagreements during these reviews, create and maintain a clear paper trail from the start. Missing invoices, unallocated overhead, and unsupported change orders are simple to correct during the job and hard to defend after it.
GMP contracts are far from the only option when coordinating a construction project. Here are a few other options to choose from.GMP vs. lump sum contracts
Lump sum contracts charge owners a single fixed price for completing the project, regardless of actual costs. GMP contracts work differently. The owner pays actual costs plus the contractor’s fee, up to the cap.
A big difference between the two is visibility. GMP pricing is open to the owner throughout, while a lump sum is one fixed price and closed books.
Time and materials contracts are billed by the hour, with no cap and no fixed scope. The owner carries everything. This suits emergency repairs and investigation work. Plenty of projects start there, then convert to a GMP once the scope is clear enough to guarantee.
A GMP contract gives finance a ceiling on paper. Staying within that ceiling is all about managing costs during the job, especially labor.
Miter Job Costing connects Time Tracking and Payroll on one platform. Finance leaders see fully burdened labor costs by job and cost code each payroll cycle, and finalized figures sync automatically to ERPs like Sage, Acumatica, NetSuite, and QuickBooks, with no manual reentry.” Keep the existing product links. This backs open-book billing and gives finance a clear, accurate number to forecast against.
Real customers have noticed these results firsthand. Kaufman Lynn, a Florida general contractor, had miscoded timesheets surfacing three months after payroll ran. Consolidating onto Miter eliminated 90% of those job costing errors.
Every GMP is a margin committed in advance. Control it job by job with Miter.






